![]() |
1887 The Battle For Preston Park |
A Preston
Football Club is thought to have existed since 1882,
but it was in 1886, just after the proclamation of the Shire of Preston
and a merger with the better-known Gowerville club that the name became
more prominent. Some early correspondence
to the Shire Council suggests that the name was the Preston And
Gowerville Football Club, but like many combined names, it was quickly
and unofficially abbreviated to "Preston". The few
match results that appeared during 1886 invariably
called the club Preston, and the oldest surviving report of an annual
meeting in April of 1887 also was headed "Preston Football Club", but
the Gowerville name was briefly revived soon after, and perhaps with a
political motive in mind. After
spending their 1886 season playing on the unknown
paddock, the club again tried to gain access to Preston Park and the
April meeting of the Shire Council received a letter minuted as from
the "Gowerville and Preston Football Club" asking permission to use the
Park for football. Gowerville
had always had a strong ally on Council in William
Paterson (a business partner of the earliest known secretary of the
football club in William Watson).
Paterson in August of the previous year had been elected Shire
President, in fact his fourth term in that position having led the old
Shire of Jika for three years. The previous
mayor, Cr. Alex Short moved a motion that the
Parks Committee meet the football club to inspect the Park and report
on its suitability for football. Paterson
seconded the motion before Cr. William Bayliss, who coincidentally had
played in the Coburg side against the first known Preston team in 1880,
suggested that the matter could be settled more quickly by "a personal
inspection to see whether the game could be played there without damage
to the trees and shrubs". Paterson,
however, (perhaps through the hard lessons of many
years spent on the Council) was adamant that it had to be done by the
book, warning, "granting permission was right enough so long as no
damage was done but the moment damage was caused the ratepayers would
come down upon the Council". The matter
was left in the hands of the Parks Committee, but
Bayliss's crusade for a "personal inspection" was to prove crucial. A fortnight
after the meeting, the Preston Football Club held
their meeting at the new Bradford Hall in High
Street. The hall, which became
the regular meeting place for many groups around the area, was
constructed by James Bradford and opened in November of the previous
year. President of
the club was J. G. Powell, noted the previous
season as secretary, but an earlier report suggested William Watson
held this position and Powell may have in fact been the incumbent
President. Secretary
for 1887 was John D. Marshall, a well-known local
builder and storekeeper in South Preston and treasurer was the local
political activist, Frank Donovan. From the
meeting we know that the newly combined team played
12 games during 1886, winning five, losing five and drawing
two. Total receipts were put at
£12-1-6 and expenditure £10-11-6. Our first
"best and fairest" award by the way of a dinner
service was won by T. Horan, the prize then going to the "best all
round player". Medals were also presented
to R. Lee, J. Hopkins and W. Watson and Horan was elected captain. There is no
evidence one way or the other to suggest whether
Preston played in a division of the Victorian Junior Football
Association, or just arranged
games. The number of
matches played suggests an organised competition, and this is supported
by comments made at the meeting that Preston's playing list was
"material for a First-Rate Junior club". At the
Shire's meeting in May, plans were submitted by the
Parks Committee showing the portion required for football and "such
alterations as would be
necessary". A letter from the
club explained what measures they planned to protect the trees and
shrubs from harm, and the Committee's thoughts "were favourable for the
purpose sought under a two month trial". A few weeks
before, there had been an somewhat unhappy
cricket match between the Preston Union club and a team with a somewhat
unsavoury reputation called Industry, based in
Brunswick. The Collingwood Mercury had
deplored the constant use of "objectionable" language by the visiting
team, perhaps prompting Cr. Short (a publican of some 30 years standing
as well as a prominent Justice of the Peace) to ask whether the
football club had a regulation to "prevent the use of improper language
by its members or players". This seems
to have been the opening that Cr. Bayliss had been
waiting for. He had had his "personal
inspection" and let the Council into a few home truths : "
… the trees in the Park
are already very much damaged, the buildings were in a very much a bad
state, the seats and sills have been cut and carved with knives and the
walls covered with disgraceful writing" (Current councillors who think
it
would be clever to remove the fencing and return the grounds to open
parklands may like to take heed of his findings). Bayliss put much of
the blame on
"youths visiting the Park on Sundays use language so filthy and disgusting respectable people are unable to use the Park and he had prohibited his own children from entering the place".
Bayliss demanded that a full-time
caretaker be appointed, a move that gathered support and ultimately a
motion was put to invite applications from persons willing to take
charge of the Park "and look after the trees and
flowers". After some discussion as to
whether tendering out the position would be cheaper, the motion was
passed and it was ultimately resolved that the football club be allowed
to play on the park "during good behaviour". So the Grand Opening of the new
football ground was to be on May 28 when Preston were to host Royal
Park, an area which hosted many of the earliest football
clubs. Just what happened in the
intervening three weeks will never be known, but when the footballers
arrived to play their first match on the hallowed turf they found
"… at the last moment, Council interfered and issued their fist that the game would not be permitted to be played in the Park. In the face of this vexatious turn of events, the two teams set to work and cleared as well as possible an adjacent vacant piece of land".
"The game was something of a mixture of aquatics and football as the players stubbornly went to work. The visitors made some brilliant play but the home team under captain Horan succeeded in winning with 2 goals and 9 behinds to Royal Park's 14 behinds".Collingwood Mercury, June 4, 1887
As well as the drama
on the day,
the scores in rather lengthy report on the match contrasts dramatically
with those previously note in the Collingwood Advertiser which showed
the result as 2.8 to 0.7. The vacant land was
would have
been to the south or west of the
ground. Broadhurst's Jika Tannery
dominated the site where Preston Market now stands and a number of
smaller tanneries were in Mary
Street. That the land was still vacant was
rather fortuitous. The report on the
cricket match where complaints were raised about objectionable language
suggested "the early attendance of visitors was nil in consequence of a
land sale beside the ground". It was back to the
drawing boards
and at the Council on the following Monday night, Powell and Horan were
given leave to plead the club's case and although there was no reason
given for the previous late change of heart, Council agreed to adhere
to the original conditions. The first game
finally came off on
June 4 and witnessed by "a large concourse of spectators who
impartially recognised any good play" (for certainly the first and
probably the last time at Cramer Street!). The
visitors were noted for their neat and effective little marks, rules at
the time specifying no minimum distance the ball had to travel for a
mark to be paid. Many teams became adept
at chipping the ball one or two yards, especially when trying to
improve the angle for a shot on goal.. Again the Collingwood
papers
couldn't agree on scores, or even on the name of the opposition team,
the Advertiser calling them Star of Collingwood, the Mercury,
Collingwood Star, but according to the latter, Preston recorded a
favourable draw, 1.7 to 1.5. (Behinds weren't
officially part of the result of a match until 1897 but if teams kicked
an equal number of goals, the draw was said to be "favourable" to the
team scoring the most behinds).