![]() |
1878 Football Backs Out Of A Corner |
The game was the first Association match to be
played on the Melbourne Cricket Ground.
The Melbourne Football Club since its inception
in 1859 had usually played on a patch of land to the north of the
M.C.G. and rather significantly known as "The Gravel Pit" - in earlier
days, complete with trees on the playing area and a creek bed running
diagonally across the surface.
The "metropolitan" ground as it was sometimes called was
unpopular with other clubs with two teams at the end of 1877
threatening to refuse to play there.
Historians over the years have placed the blame
for football not being played on the M.C.G. at the feet of the cricket
club itself, usually with claims that the cricketers feared damage to
the surface if the ground was used for football, but there is no real
evidence to support this general belief.
The idle winter months were often used for extending and
improving the ground and the surrounds, but over the previous ten or
twelve years, whenever permission was sought to play on the ground, the
cricket club usually granted it.
Another misconception is that the football club
was actually part of the M.C.C., but they were in fact separate bodies
and by the start of the 1877 season, each had their own problem.
The cricket club's finances were in somewhat in
disarray after a series of largely unsuccessful ventures to attract
patrons into the ground, and the footballers sensed their opportunity
The club approached the M.C.C. for permission
to play the
Admission was set at sixpence, with the same
payable for entry into the Reserve.
The fee was considered more than reasonable compared to
the charges at the first cricket match between more-or-less
representative English and Australian teams the previous year when the
equivalent admission was set at two shillings.
It wasn't only the match being played on the
hallowed turf of the M.C.G. that made this game unique.
From this description, the "oval" must have had
sqaure ends, but sadly none of the match reports give an estimate of
the length of the playing area, but it too was probably somewhat in
excess of what the players of the day were used to (the playing area at
the "G" has fluctuated over time but has generally been about 185 by
160 yards).
Like most experiments, some were for and some
against. The
leading football writer of the time, Peter Pindar
of The Australasian liked the idea, suggesting a "more open and
friendlier style of play", but his fellow writer with The Argus thought
it “… much too scattered and not as exciting as it
would have been had the combatants had been obliged to keep near
together”.
Most of the contemporary match reports support The Argus writer's preference for the closely packed game of the time which was much closer in style to Rugby.
The football public of the day seem to have
sided with the latter opinion, albeit briefly.
The corresponding match in 1878 (where
The 1877 match, won 2-1 by
This was also the first Association fixture
where entrance charges were made.
Carlton introduced regular admission fees later in the
year to help offset the cost of fencing their ground in the University
in Madeline Street, now the section of Swanston
Street to the north of Victoria Street.
It was also the first game where a grandstand was
officially available to the paying public, some 2,000 paying the extra
for the privilege.
Not that viewing football from the M.C.G.
grandstand of the time was a new experience for the members.
The grandstand, opened the previous year,
featured a unique design that allowed the flooring and seats to be
reversed, allowing patrons to enjoy the cricket during the summer and
then football on "the pit" in winter (a game between Melbourne and
Barwon is believed to have been the first time the seating was
repositioned for a football match).
According the Alf Batchelder's
recent publication, "Pavilions in the Park", the floor of the stand was
suspended on hinges along the middle line with moveable supports
underneath the highest point, which, when withdrawn, allowed the floor
to be sloped in the opposite direction.
The reversal took about 13 ½ hours, the Frencham Brothers undertaking
the work for a fee of £8-10 with a week's notice or
£14 for an emergency switch.
With no great damage to the playing surface,
the East Melbourne, South Melbourne and Corio (Geelong) clubs also seen
the light and allowed football to be played on their patch of turf and
the M.C.C. for the 1879 season actively campaigned for clubs to use
their ground, Melbourne playing there around 12 times and Hotham (later
North Melbourne) and Carlton also hosting matches.
Oddly enough, the laws of the Australian code
(unlike English or American forms of football) have never specifically
defined the size or shape of the playing ground.
Some twenty years after the laws of the
"Melbourne Rules" or Australian football were laid down in 1859,
William Hammersley, one
of the four men responsible "after several drinks" for their formation
recalled that they rejected the rules in use at Rugby School in England
as they were too complicated, opting instead for a simpler code that
could be understood by newcomers to the colony.
The flexibility extended to finding a suitable
piece of land to play on.
The first rule ever laid down decided "The distance
between the Goals and the Goal Posts shall be decided upon by the
Captains of the sides playing" (the famous schoolboy match of 1858
between Scotch College and the Church of England Grammar took place on
a pitch with the goals around half a mile apart).
Rule Four at least limited the size somewhat …
"The game shall be played within a space of not more than 200 yards
wide, …", but beyond that, nothing ever appeared in the
rules suggesting a change in the shape of the ground although a maximum
length and width continued to be specified (we must check the myriad
list of laws in today's rule book)
Teams at the time consisted of 20 combatants
with the line-up similar to today - five lines of three players, three
followers "when the ball is in motion - these can also take it from
out-of-bounds", and with extra men, a "goal sneak" and "goal keeper" at
opposite ends of the field.
Although there are hundreds of references and
comments on football before 1875, there is very little describing just
how the game was played. "Goal
sneak" for many years was something of a derogatory term describing a
player who "sneaked" ahead of the scrum to try and score a goal,
suggesting the game may have been played more like rugby with most of
the team behind the ball and pushing it forward rather than the later
positional game.
The first detailed description of the early
football came in 1876 with the publication of "The Footballer", the
first annual devoted to the game.
Despite the playing positions being familiar,
the start of the match would confuse today's fans.
Hostilities commenced with both teams lined up in their
defensive side of the ground.
The team losing the toss kicked off with the forward
players hurrying to their positions - the same occurred after a goal
was kicked, the team "losing" the goal taking the kick-off. The concept of
throwing the ball up in the centre of the ground didn’t come
into effect until 1890.
The game has struggled with the out-of-bounds
problem since its inception with various systems of free kicks and
throw-ins experimented with, but according to "The Footballer", the
scenario would have recognisable by today's players, but again with a
subtle difference